Fri, 20 September 2024 03:03:54am
In a dramatic turn of events, popular YouTuber Dhruv Rathee finds himself embroiled in a legal battle. A Delhi court has summoned Rathee over a defamation case filed by BJP leader Suresh Karamshi Nakhua, who alleges that Rathee called him a "violent and abusive" troll. The court's notice marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing feud between the political spokesperson and the influential social media figure.
On July 22, the Delhi court issued a summons to Dhruv Rathee following a defamation suit by BJP spokesperson Suresh Karamshi Nakhua. The court also issued a notice regarding Nakhua's plea for interim relief and scheduled the next hearing for August 6. This legal action comes on the heels of a controversial video uploaded by Rathee on July 7, 2024, titled “My Reply to Godi Youtubers | Elvish Yadav | Dhruv Rathee.”
In his video, Rathee allegedly referred to Nakhua as part of "violent and abusive trolls," a claim that Nakhua vehemently denies. Represented by advocates Raghav Awasthi and Mukesh Sharma, Nakhua argued that Rathee's accusations were baseless and damaging to his reputation. "Rathee in a highly provocative and incendiary video that spread like wildfire across digital platforms, made bold and unsubstantiated claims against him," Nakhua stated, emphasizing the severe impact on his public image.
The video in question has sparked significant backlash, with Nakhua claiming widespread condemnation and ridicule as a result of Rathee's statements. This case highlights the potent influence of digital content and the serious repercussions that can arise from online disputes.
Dhruv Rathee, known for his critical and analytical videos, released the contentious video in response to allegations from Elvish Yadav, a fellow YouTuber and Bigg Boss OTT 2 Winner. Rathee's initial video addressed claims made by Yadav and other "Godi YouTubers," while his follow-up video, released on Sunday, continued to rebut these allegations, extending the feud further into the public eye.
The Delhi court's upcoming hearing on August 6 will be a critical juncture in this defamation case. Both parties will present their arguments, with Rathee defending his statements and Nakhua seeking to restore his tarnished reputation. The legal proceedings are expected to attract significant attention, given the high-profile nature of the individuals involved and the broader implications for free speech and digital discourse.
Conclusion: As Dhruv Rathee prepares to face the Delhi court, the case underscores the fine line between freedom of expression and defamation in the age of social media. The outcome of this legal battle could set a precedent for how online content creators navigate the complex landscape of digital criticism and personal reputation.